Search for: "Barber v. Barber" Results 461 - 480 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
Georgia judgment and the Ilascu and others v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
To reach its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Emma Snell
Ryan Barber and Alex Leary report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:40 pm by Joy Waltemath
Finally, his state law whistleblower claim was dismissed because he did not identify a single law, rule, or regulation allegedly violated by the employer (Barber v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by admin
**Nestle Defends Class Action in the Central District of California with Successful Motion to Dismiss and Sets Valuable Precedent With California Transparency in Supply Chains Act Safe Harbor Defense** . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
.  A1485 Gunther (MS) -- Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for lifeSUMM : Amd SS168-h & 168-o, Cor L Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for life. 01/09/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA1531 Benjamin -- Provides guidelines for evaluating applications for barbers and cosmetology license where applicant has prior criminal recordSUMM : Amd SS434 & 438, Gen Bus L Provides that persons who have a criminal record… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
It is not possible to determine from this file whether Smith, Bunch or Barber were paid informants. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Muriel Bristol was a biologist who studied algae at the Rothamsted Experimental Station in England, after World War I. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]