Search for: "Bayer v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 4:54 am by Marie Louise
State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania (Kluwer Patent Blog) Spain: Modification of EP translations (2) – Supreme Court grants fourth appeal, filed again by Pfizer: EP0325571 (PatLit) US: Federal Trade Commission issues report on reverse settlement agreements in FY2010 (Patent Docs) (Orange Book Blog) (FDA Law Blog) US: FTC posts friendly reminder to please send them your ANDA litigation settlement agreements (Orange Book Blog) US: Billups-Rothenberg v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/2e82fnb (Orange Legal Technologies) HP Exec Spills Huge Company Secret On LinkedIn Profile - http://tinyurl.com/3dcrndv (Matt Rosoff) ILTA London Reviewed - http://tinyurl.com/3vdztue (Joanna Goodman) IT Pros Cross-Examine Digital Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/3npm69z (Kim Davis) It's Time Users Demand Better Data Handling - http://tinyurl.com/3hflkfv (Scott Koegler) Lifecycle Management: Fixed v Dynamic Content - http://tinyurl.com/3pnj44s (James Watson) Myths,… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:19 pm by Marie Louise
Merck (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keppra (Levetiracetam) – US: Orange Book patent listing precipitates DJ action to trigger generic Keppra XR 180-day exclusivity forfeiture: Par Pharmaceutical v UCB et al (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) Naropin (Ropivacaine) – US: Judge O’Malley in dissent: Patent assignments should be a matter of state law: Abraxis BioScience v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”) (holding that court of appeals “conclude[d], in error, that a patent claim cannot be proved obvious merely by showing that the combination of elements was ‘obvious to try’”); see e.g., Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday, in Golan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:50 am by Genevieve P. Rapadas
" The doctrine, which makes orders denying motions for class certification immediately appealable, was originally adopted by the California Supreme Court in Daar v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
 The Kat now sees that licensing has already been thought of in the context of pay-to-delay, is is apparent from the application for certiorari in Louisiana Wholesale v Bayer (here). [read post]