Search for: "Bitter v. Bitter" Results 461 - 480 of 998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 7:02 am by Ray Dowd
   An ad for Galerie Voemel brags of its legacy:Die Galerie Vömel, mehr als ein halbes Jahrhundert in Düsseldorf ansässig, wurde von Alex Vömel - Geschäftsführer der legendären Galerie Flechtheim - gegründet und wird heute von seinem Sohn Edwin Vömel weiter geführt.Vor einigen Jahren ist die Galerie in das alte Stadtpalais gegenüber vom Stadtmuseum in die Karlstadt umgesiedelt.Die Galerie Vömel… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:31 am by Rose Hughes
Regen versus Estar was one of the key decisions of the High Court last year (Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63 (Pat), IPKat here). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Non-congruent flavor volatiles may function, at least in part, by decreasing, or masking, the perceived bitterness of the HIS, thereby enhancing the perceived sweetness of the HIS. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
Mark Graber has argued that this is how the constitutional dispute over Texas' admission to the union was finally settled, as well as the legitimacy of the Bush Presidency following Bush v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Sandy Levinson
To the contrary, I agree with the Court’s decision in Marsh v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
Starbucks Secret menu hereCat Poop Coffee v Starbucks Coffee here (yes, you read that correctly) [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm by Howard Friedman
But if that sentiment prevails, the Nation will experience bitter and lasting wounds. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
Yesterday, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) issued its decision in Case C-432/18, Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH [here]. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
It is well known that divorce proceedings can be amongst the most bitter and hard-fought in all of litigation, and the Hildebrand principle has long been seen as an important weapon in the otherwise poorly stocked armoury of the poorer partner. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Wade.Rehnquist wrote a bitter dissent, alternatively mocking and deriding the three justices' professed devotion to the principle of stare decisis - that is, adherence to prior decisions. [read post]