Search for: "Brennan v. Brennan" Results 461 - 480 of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The next day, the court ruled 5-4 in Milliken v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere on Cato-joined amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 10:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Also, and I regret forgetting this, see below Justice Scalia’s internal memorandum to Justice Brennan in the Duro v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:51 am
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:31 pm by Christine Corcos
Virginia is the latest appearance in a series that includes Justice Brennan's use in In re Sawyer, and Justice Stevens' in Califano v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:03 pm
Virginia is the latest appearance in a series that includes Justice Brennan's use in In re Sawyer, and Justice Stevens' in Califano v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
” On appeal, only Justices Douglas, Marshall, and Brennan would accept this argument. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by Andrew Hamm
” Sessions was referring to 2015’s Johnson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2005, 8:14 am
Tevis (79 N.J. 422, 400 A.2d 1189 [1979]); but see Brennan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 11:00 am by Jameel Jaffer
(Notably, another signatory to the same brief is Don Verrilli, who served as Solicitor General under President Barack Obama and in that capacity represented the government in Amnesty v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:48 am
That, he says, is a matter best left to alternative doctrines such a forum non conveniens; and, presumably, the decision of a state court whether to exercise jurisdiction.This is even farther than Justice Brennan would have gone, who could only hold in Burger King that usually when you have minimum contacts the exercise of jurisdiction would be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am by Mark Tushnet
And (for me) the issue of scandal is quite serious here: Others who see the orthodox Catholic judge affirming Roe v. [read post]