Search for: "C. Jones" Results 461 - 480 of 3,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
LOGICWEB ED Pennsylvania 2013http://t.co/dc7nZB9Foc -> Bennett Jones, McCarthy Tetrault make Top 100 Employers list http://t.co/f4lHtDb3sk -> Justice opens up to social media http://t.co/JX3VnOifM8 -> Yahoo sours on its search partnership with Microsoft http://t.co/WRVQTZsthO -> European Parliament Votes to Permit Pseudonymous Data Profiling http://t.co/qhHxdbHg95 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-10-21: Legislative Summary Published for C-56, An Act to… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Speakers: Thomas O’Neil, Advisor, WellCare Health Plans C. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:02 pm
§924(c) conviction, for which he received a consecutive five years. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:39 am
Case outcomes turn on courts’ differing interpretations of Jones and the First Amendment, not on how the parties have arranged their affairs under state law. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
Case outcomes turn on courts’ differing interpretations of Jones and the First Amendment, not on how the parties have arranged their affairs under state law. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:17 pm by Tung Yin
I signed up for a public league on ESPN, and here's the team I drafted (I had pick #10 in a 10-team league): 1 (10 overall) - Joey Votto 1b 2 (11) - Roy Halladay sp 3 (30) - Giancarlo (Mike) Stanton of 4 (31) - David Wright 3b 5 (50) - Zack Greinke sp 6 (51) - Ben Zobrist 2b/of 7 (70) - Brian McCann c 8 (71) - Stephen Strasburg sp 9 (90) - Ryan Madson rp 10 (91) - Adam Jones of 11 (110) - Matt Garza sp 12 (111) - Desmond Jennings of 13 (130) - Joel Hanrahan rp 14 (131) -… [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:15 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Bottom line, I agree with Jones' first three points but not his last two. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Jones, one of the most anticipated cases of this Term. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:56 pm by Tom Smith
Jones, joined by Judge Carolyn Dineen King (with Judge Gregg Costa concurring in the judgment), held that Speech First had standing to challenge various University of Texas speech codes, on behalf of its members:The chilling effect of allegedly vague [campus speech] regulations, coupled with a range of potential penalties for violating the regulations, … [is] sufficient "injury" to ensure that Speech First "has a 'personal stake in the outcome of the… [read post]