Search for: "CLAYTON v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm by Matthew DeVries
The rule relating to the effect of a contractor who exceeds its licensing limit is now clear based upon the decision in Clayton Pickens v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm by Sarah Aberg
Regulation Best Interest is, in large part, a response to the highly-criticized Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule (the “DOL Fiduciary Rule”), which was vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on March 15, 2018 (see Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm by Matthew DeVries
The rule relating to the effect of a contractor who exceeds its licensing limit is now clear based upon the decision in Clayton Pickens v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am by Wells Bennett
Connell says that yes, in fact, some courts (including those in his home state of Virginia) can be quite rigid when it comes to waiver. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state’s highest court relied primarily upon a 2001 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Kyllo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm by Steve Lash
The Maryland Court of Appeals, in DRD Pool Service Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:27 am by The Swartz Law Firm
Narcotics officers of the Clayton County Sheriff applied for a search warrant of Jason Ward’s apartment based on confidential informant’s information that he sold narcotics out of his apartment. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:28 am by Richmond Cariaga
Supreme Court reinforced this protection in the landmark 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am by becassidy
Clayton County, Georgia (Consolidated with Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]