Search for: "Clay v. Clay"
Results 461 - 480
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The case is concerned with the production of a stormtrooper helmet based on a clay model and images of the design. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
KSR v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:01 am
Judge Clay filed a separate dissenting opinion, urging that the majority adopted the wrong standard of review and erred in its application and weighing of the factors (Jammal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 4:31 am
[I]n Gary B. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:04 am
” Clay v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:05 am
Martin Construction v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
Said the General Court, ‘parts of cutting and polishing diamond machines; bits and cutting wheels for the following industries: marble, granite, stone, clay, slabs, tiles and brick, and, in general terms, cutting tools as parts of the equipment included in Class 7’ in class 7 and ‘hand held abrasive items (wheels and grinding wheels)’ in class 8, covered by the figurative STAYER CTM, were dissimilar to PU hand float trowels. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
Concrete and Clay here (earworm warning) Concrete Angel here (tissue warning) [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am
Readers of the IPKat blog may remember that Lindsay Lohan tried last year to convince a New York court that a video game had infringed her rights to publicity when depicting a blonde woman making the “V” sign, as Ms. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:16 am
In FireSabre Consulting LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
By James V. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
” Durham v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:50 am
This time, for my book cover on McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
Apotex, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Dunlap Memorial Hosp Northern District of Ohio at Akron FMLA CLAY, Circuit Judge. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
Dickey Clay Mfg. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:18 am
The westlaw headnote states, "The Court of Appeals, Clay, Circuit Judge, held that Indian tribe was restored tribe, for purposes of Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:11 pm
The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
