Search for: "Coates v. Coates"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2009, 2:08 pm
First, Wright suggests (as do Easterbrook and Coates & Hubbard) that a lack of sophistication on the part of certain mutual fund investors may not by itself imperil competitiveness because, in the words of Easterbrook quoting Schwartz & Wilde, "sophisticated investors who do shop create a competitive pressure that protects the rest. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:52 pm
Coates v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 8,092,876 entitled COATING COMPOSITIONS FOR CANS AND METHODS OF COATING and owned by Valspar Sourcing. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:03 pm
Graham Burnett recovers the strange story of Maurice v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:00 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Spicer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The Colorado Supreme Court ruling in "People of the State of Colorado v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:18 am
v=9K3RQHB-oTE They explained how one of most promising areas of drug research is the creation of generic biologic medicines, or biosimilars. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:15 am
As the Texas Supreme Court said in the 1994 opinion, Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:15 am
Tags: Elena Kagan, Procedure, Solicitor General Related posts Reflections on my First Live Oral Arguments – Ricci v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:30 am
However, the court held that the cancellation would be an impermissible collateral attack on the previous judgment, and affirmed the TTAB's decision on that basis.Judge Newman, concurring in the judgment, would have affirmed on the same grounds as the TTAB, namely that because the issue of the registration's validity was decided before the district court, res judicata applied to prevent relitigation of the issue.More detail of Nasalok Coating Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
(Teva Women’s Health) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:13 pm
Amy Jackson’s ‘A critical legal pluralist analysis of the Begum Case’, Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 46/2010, is available on SSRN here: This paper considers the advantages of a critical legal pluralist analysis of the English case R (on the application of Begum) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:55 pm
[www.freepatentsonline.com]For field emission displays and other devices that employ nanostructures for electron emission there are two methodologies of manufacture - 1) prefabrication of the nanostructure which is used as an emissive coating for electrodes on a substrate or 2) direct fabrication of the nanostructure on the substrate. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:42 am
In the case we will be addressing (Dura-Bond Coating, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 6, 2009 - 10 AM: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
Nielsen relates another case where a V-13 application increased yield by 64 bushels per acre, compared to a starter-only application. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Coats Sandel v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:59 pm
Spicer v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
By Eric Goldman Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:28 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
