Search for: "DAVID v STATE FUND"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm
NOVEMBER SITTING: Bilski v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:07 pm
The ACLU won in state district court, lost in the Colorado Court of Appeals, and the case is now before the Colorado Supreme Court, as Taxpayers for Public Education v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle offers his take on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:03 pm
The ICA analogized this case to the Hawaii Supreme Court's decision in Sandy Beach Defense Fund v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
By David Yucht, J.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
” Additional commentary on the case comes from David Burge in an op-ed for Newsweek and from Wilton Gregory and others at The Atlantic. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm
United States was filed with assistance from the ACLU. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
O'Brien, United States Attorney; William J. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller represented to Joe Stocker of First Bank that the David E. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
The panel, made up of Judges David Tatel, Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao, was uniformly skeptical of Consovoy’s arguments. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Tom Udall (D-NM) and David Vitter (R-LA) to update the federal chemicals safety law. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
This case requires us to decide a fundamental question of federal versus state funding under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 ("NCLB" or "the Act"), 20 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
See State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:16 am
In State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
The case, out of Judge Carl Ginsberg’s state district court in Dallas, involved allegations that a title company authorized disbursement of escrowed funds without authorization. [read post]
