Search for: "DUNCAN v. DUNCAN"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 8:40 am
In this week’s case (Field v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:42 am
” See Special v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
In fact, in its 2012 decision in Knox v Service Employees, the Court had noted that Abood was “something of an anomaly,” the Court pointed out here. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Although the error was plain, the employer could not show that it affected its substantial rights because the jury found that the employee had proven that his termination was “because of” his protected activity, which satisfied Nassar (EEOC v AC Widenhouse, Inc, June 24, 2014, Duncan, A). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
” In Tupper v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
In this week’s case (Best v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
However, in 2006 in Blank v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 8:07 am
Using Judge Posner's reasoning in Hoctor v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:55 am
On the journalism front, Wells noted the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Hedges v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
Duncan, 2014 U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Castro v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:47 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:53 am
The case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, the New Hampshire Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Duncan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
Ruling on an issue of first impression for the state’s high court on Friday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Duncan Thompson (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 11:43 am
Larson v. [read post]
