Search for: "David v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 14,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
The debate had an international rather than a domestic focus and was replied to by the Minister of State at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Anne-Marie Trevelyan. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
Turning to recent actions, the July decision in SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
David Boyle, Snapchat’s Senior Director of Products, stated in his Declaration that he was not sure whether his company would be regulated by Act 689. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
M&F Worldwide, Katz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
David Cicilline (D-R.I.), with Khan now placed at a senior staff position of the Antitrust Subcommittee that Cicilline chaired, a broad investigation of competition, anticompetitive conduct, and antitrust enforcement involving leading digital firms was launched. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:23 pm
In Wednesday's Nat'l Ass'n for Gun Rights [and companion cases] v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
The fall schedule for the New York University School of Law Legal History Colloquium, co-convened by David Golove, Daniel Hulsebosch, and Noah Rosenblum, is now available:September 13 Reva Siegel, Nicholas deB. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
New York Supreme Court Justice Thomas Marcelle ruled Monday in the case Cuomo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Rivkin is counsel of record in Moore v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 12:41 pm
New Article: David Brady, Poverty, Not the Poor, Science Advances, Aug. 23, 2023. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 9:08 am
United States…. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
One notable case is Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
