Search for: "Ely v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Eli Lilly, the court reaffirmed that written description is determined based on the state of the art as of a patent’s priority date and that evidence which illuminates the state of the art only subsequent to the priority date is not relevant to written description. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:09 pm by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
Elie's in 30th (thanks Georgetown), while Kash is 21st and has "Kansas" losing to Michigan State this round anyway.] [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
 Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:54 am by Marie Louise
State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania (Kluwer Patent Blog) Spain: Modification of EP translations (2) – Supreme Court grants fourth appeal, filed again by Pfizer: EP0325571 (PatLit) US: Federal Trade Commission issues report on reverse settlement agreements in FY2010 (Patent Docs) (Orange Book Blog) (FDA Law Blog) US: FTC posts friendly reminder to please send them your ANDA litigation settlement agreements (Orange Book Blog) US: Billups-Rothenberg v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
The International Court of Justice's Decision in Bosnia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
In an essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of the Syracuse Law Review, I argue that taken at face value, DC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]