Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
” The 1866 Court of Exchequer judgment in Diamond v Sutton concerned an action for defamation brought in England against a Jersey-based defendant. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm
” However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
As it stands, the law in England currently states that pre-nuptial agreements are not automatically binding. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
D.J England, Jr. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:48 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:35 am
AJ v DM [2019] is the leading authority on this situation concerning jurisdiction and locus for financial remedy proceedings. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:28 am
Changing this would mean that patentees are no longer guaranteed swift relief in Germany, where infringement proceedings on the merits on average take significantly less time than e.g. in the Netherlands or England. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
Actually, it is this paper’s view that if this is to be followed to its ultimate logical conclusion, then any country in the world has jurisdiction to render a judgment capable of recognition in Nigeria and other common law countries as long as the originating process was served on the defendant within its territory regardless of how little, if any, is that jurisdiction’s connection to the case.[17] We do not believe that such a result is consistent with the ends of justice.[18] … [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
” To be constitutionally valid, a limitation on freedom of expression has to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society following the four-step test from R v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:11 am
It provides another stark reminder of the importance of the way in which experts’ reports are prepared in patent litigation in England. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In McRaney v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
On Wednesday in Edwards v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:34 am
The High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, has come out with another ruling concerning blocking injunctions, this time in the case of Matchroom Boxing Ltd and another v British Telecommunications plc and others [2020] EWHC 2868 (Ch) (here). [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 10:06 pm
International Practice v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:40 am
v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
Enka objected to these Russian proceedings claiming that under the terms of its contract of engagement any such dispute was to be arbitrated via the ICC in England: in September 2019, it sought declaratory orders from the English High Court that the matter should be arbitrated in England, that the applicable law of the arbitration agreement was English, and requested an English anti-suit injunction to restrain Chubb from continuing the Russian litigation. [read post]
