Search for: "English v. People" Results 461 - 480 of 3,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2019, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
Mirow (Florida International University); Daniel Lord Smail (Harvard University); David V. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
[Hat Tip: Co-blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
“Less than a week before the 50th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:50 pm
A comment to the previous entry on legal entity mentions the term juridical person, which gets many ghits, although not all on English or U.S. sites. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by SHG
  Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am by Jeanne Huang
Dhanjibhai, the Bombay High court upheld the English rule of lex situs for the succession of property situated in India. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(c) Adjudge and declare that the Russian Federation’s recognition of the independenceof the so-called ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ and ‘Luhansk People’s Republic’ on22 February 2022 is based on a false claim of genocide and therefore has no basisin the Genocide Convention. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
The English court had, in effect, set rates for a portfolio for which a large part had no enforceable English patent. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Following the order, in 2012, Serafin became involved with Kolbe House, a care home for elderly Polish people, as a handyman. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:36 pm
U.S., that dates back at least to 1666 in English history. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
 The English Court of Chancery in Amicable Soc'y v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The English approach, though, is not without its problems. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm by Bridget Crawford
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am by INFORRM
  The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]