Search for: "Epp v. Epp"
Results 461 - 480
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Epps, 11-6550, a capital habeas case from the Fifth Circuit involving a Batson claim, and is holding that case pending the arrival of the record. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps examines Buck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
In Honeycutt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:11 pm
See Jackson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
See Groves v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
Co-host Dan Epps and I will likely talk more about this case in an episode of our podcast next week, and I'll try to link to that when we do. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Mississippi (1898) and Plessy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:36 pm
10; Goltzman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
U.S. and Hill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:09 am
In Terry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
Yesterday’s argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
Canada In John v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:12 am
” Dezham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
Epps, 2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
” In the latest episode of their First Mondays podcast, Dan Epps and Ian Samuel talk to two Supreme Court practitioners at Akin Gump about “the strategy behind the firm’s win in Patchak v. [read post]
