Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 6,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm by Bryan Hawkins
”  The lawsuit was filed in 2008, prior to the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Becton Dickinson & Co., which held that a decision on the merits is a "final decision" that can be appealed even if the award or amount of attorneys' fees for the litigation remains to be determined.Or, in Justice Kennedy's own words:Federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from "final decisions" of United States district courts. 28 U. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am by Terry Lenamon
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:42 am
Focarino that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") was entitled to recover attorneys' fees when brought to court for a review of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") rulings. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:54 pm
The ex-wife suffered from Lupus, had sustained two strokes, and was determined to be disabled by the United States Social Security Administration. [read post]
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:34 pm by Ann Caresani
The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion today in an ERISA case regarding the breadth of Section 502(a)(3) relief, and the common-fund doctrine. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]