Search for: "Fish v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 3,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 4:56 pm by Nigel Stacey
Coast Guard units received distress calls stating that the F/V ARCTIC FOX II, a 66-foot commercial fishing boat, had begun taking on water. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:53 pm by Joseph Stacey
Coast Guard units received distress calls stating that the F/V ARCTIC FOX II, a 66-foot commercial fishing boat, had begun taking on water. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 3:05 pm by NARF
Tying a tribal officer's hands: Tribal law enforcement authority under United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
United States, the court curbed a massive prosecutorial overreach, ruling that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was not violated when a fisherman tossed undersized grouper overboard in an effort to skirt federal commercial fishing regulations. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
He was ultimately rescued by fishermen working off a mother ship, the Duarte V. [read post]
District Court for the District of Oregon granted class certification in Whaley et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm by NARF
Department of the Interior (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Geothermal Projects) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider the case of a commercial fisherman convicted of violating the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the destruction of several undersized fish. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Ashley Roach Jianjun Gao, The Timor Sea Conciliation (Timor-Leste v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Discovery & objections: Class action: Standing: Affirmative defense: Summary judgment: Fishing expeditions:In the absence of privilege, the right to discovery in this state is a broad one, to be construed liberally so that parties may ascertain the strength of their case and at trial the truth may be determined. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:58 am
In Elafonissos Fishing & Shipping Co v Aigaion Insurance Co SA (2012) EWHC 892 (Comm), the defendant insurers, Aigaion Insurance Co SA (Aigaion), sought to re-amend its Defence to a claim brought by the claimant, Elafonissos Fishing & Shipping Co (Elafonissos), under a policy for marine insurance in relation to a damaged vessel, and to adduce expert evidence in support of its amendments.The vessel was lying at anchor when the effect of a cyclone caused it to drift… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by Public BLAWG
  To the extent restrictions imposed under the ESA are no greater than the restrictions imposed under state law (i.e., the public trust doctrine, the reasonable use doctrine and the California Fish and Game Code), there is no taking under Lucas v. [read post]