Search for: "GMBH" Results 461 - 480 of 2,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Peter Ling
 The case relates to a trade mark infringement case started by German movie production company Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH against US-based RatPac Entertainment LLC. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by ADR Times
” Further, the Supreme Court in Voestapline Schienen Gmbh v. [read post]
Huawei Cloud Computing Technology; Huawei Cloud Beijing; Huawei Cloud Dalian; Huawei Cloud Guangzhou; Huawei Cloud Guiyang; Huawei Cloud Hong Kong; Huawei Cloud Shanghai; Huawei Cloud Shenzhen; Huawei OpenLab Suzhou; Wulanchabu Huawei Cloud Computing Technology; Huawei Cloud Argentina; Huawei Cloud Brazil; Huawei Cloud Chile; Huawei OpenLab Cairo; Huawei Cloud France; Huawei OpenLab Paris; Huawei Cloud Berlin; Huawei OpenLab Munich; Huawei Technologies Dusseldorf GmbH; Huawei OpenLab Delhi;… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:39 pm by Scott McKeown
DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH, IPR2018-00600, Paper 67, at 11 (PTAB July 6, 2020) (precedential). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Emily Balment
Summary The claimant was named as shipper on a bill of lading for a consignment of cargo on the MV Nortrader, despite not being a party to the contract of carriage. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
., Sandoz International GMBH, Sandoz GMBH, holding that Sandoz failed to prove that the asserted claims were invalid for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), failure to meet the written description requirement, and obviousness for lack of motivation to combine... [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
., Sandoz International GMBH, Sandoz GMBH, holding that Sandoz failed to prove that the asserted claims were invalid for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), failure to meet the written description requirement, and obviousness for lack of motivation to combine the prior art references. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The dispute, which has been ongoing since 2015, is with Sprick GmbH Bielefelder Papier. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:43 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said on 3 June 2020 that “the emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic can be an opportunity to reshape the country and address its long-standing problems”. [read post]