Search for: "Governmental Employees Insurance Company"
Results 461 - 480
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas issued the first detailed opinion in Pennsylvania outlining the type of jury instructions he would provide to a jury in a Post-Koken automobile accident matter involving an insurance company defendant. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas issued the first detailed opinion in Pennsylvania outlining the type of jury instructions he would provide to a jury in a Post-Koken automobile accident matter involving an insurance company defendant. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:26 pm
Plaintiffs named Standard Insurance Company, one of its employees, and a division of the New Mexico government as defendants. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 3:16 pm
Attorneys Ofer Lion and Suzanne Ross McDowell discussed the too-common problem of charitable diversions (embezzlement) and introduced a 12-step response framework: internal nondisclosure agreements for board members, internal investigations (with thoughtful determination of who conducts the investigation), public relations plans, insurance, indemnification requirements, board liability issues, employee release / settlement agreements, governmental notice requirements… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:02 am
Last summer, a majority on the Court agreed with Hobby Lobby that it cannot be required to comply with a federal mandate to provide its female employees with health insurance that includes access to birth control, when doing so would violate the company’s religious beliefs. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:18 am
And that’s true of any insurance company you try to file a claim against. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
The following post explores this annual governmental filing phenomenon and what it means to employers in its aftermath. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:22 am
As Google grew in the early 2000s, the primary policy question seemed to be: “how do we get law out of the way of this company so it can keep organizing the internet? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
These governmental offices were established to fill out and enforce on an ongoing basis legislation that increasingly merely set goals, targets or objectives and delegated the details to organizations charged with their realization. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:45 am
The only way for an insurance company under the minimum rate law to distinguish itself is to provide service levels over and above the next guy who happens to be charging the same price for that service.When the minimum rate law ruled the insurance landscape there were oodles more (I think upwards of nearly 350+) insurance companies JUST WRITING COMP. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
BP contends that only the insurance policy language matters in deciding whether it is an "additional insured," citing cases such as EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 5:14 pm
Interestingly, each insurance company requested an employer statement which "tells about the job [plaintiff] will be doing and all the controls in place for the funds she will be overseeing. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:52 am
Is the work performed at the company’s place of business or at specific places designated by the company? [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
They can take part in a governmental insurance pool, or they can maintain a separate appropriation for workers comp. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
; and (2) Is the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) regulations the “least restrictive means” to accomplish the “compelling” government interest—that female employees receive contraceptive service insurance at no cost—as required under RFRA? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
This delay was largely influenced by the interests of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) and other asbestos mining and product manufacturing companies. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
The government would then bear the burden of showing that denial of an exemption “(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requirements mandating contraceptive coverage for employees. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" More importantly, Justice Kennedy signaled that in his view the assumption is warranted: "[T]he Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) makes the case that the mandate serves the Government’s compelling interest in providing insurance coverage that is necessary to protect the health of female employees, coverage that is significantly more costly than for a male employee. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
Department of Health and Human Services, often called the “contraceptives mandate,” under which companies are required to provide their employees with health insurance that covers a broad array of contraceptives, including some that may function as abortifacients. [read post]
