Search for: "Griffin v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the request in Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Griffin v.Swim-Tech Corp., 722 F.2d 677, 680 (11th Cir. 1984).Under Eleventh Circuit law, the district court abuses itsdiscretion if it: (1) applies an incorrect legal standard; (2)follows improper procedures in making the determination;or (3) makes findings of fact that are clearly erroneous.Morgan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:34 pm by Chris Yook
Interestingly, Judge Richard Griffin states in a dissenting opinion that the Copperweld doctrine should apply to Premier Health Partners. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison looks back at the oral argument in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison analyzes Tuesday’s decision in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
 A preview comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, with commentary from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Greg Lipper at Bill of Health Blog and Doug Laycock in The Washington Post. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
While Griffin concluded that neither statutory provision provided for jurisdiction, he nonetheless concluded that the court was obligated to conclude that there is jurisdiction under § 1369(b)(1)(F) given the 6th Circuit’s decision in National Cotton Council of America v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]