Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 461 - 480 of 1,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
Forum April 12, 2010), or that the respondent either uses in bad faith, underutilizes (in the complainant’s opinion), keeps its domain name inactive or refuses to respond to complainant’s correspondent is based on a false premise, Success Bank v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 8:19 pm
There is the presumption under the Land Title Act, that the registered owner has an absolute interest in the land.In a recent case, Sidhu v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:13 am
Kinko's Inc., defendants-respondents-appellants NEW YORK COUNTYReal PropertyNeither Plaintiffs, Nor Parents 'Designated' Holders Of Unsold Shares by Sponsor; Not Holders of Shares Sassi-Lehner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
First Interstate Bank, 218 Cal.App.3d 1410 (1990), despite a recent First District opinion (Demps v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Law Lady
WYNDSONG ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to bank because an issue of material fact existed as to when the bank took possession of the note -- Argument that the note followed the mortgage when the mortgage was assigned to bank is flawed because the mortgage follows assignment of the noteJOSEPHINE BRISTOL, Appellant, v. [read post]