Search for: "Harvard Law Review" Results 461 - 480 of 8,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Tiffany Scaramucci
The Fourteenth Amendment provides in pertinent part that no state shall “deny to any person . . . the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin,  Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).Martin Loughlin Since one purpose in publishing Against Constitutionalism (AC) with Harvard was to maximise the chance of it being read by American constitutional scholars, I cannot be other than delighted with the reviews. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 3:53 am by Rob Robinson
Available at: https://fortune.com/2023/07/05/ceo-pay-kim-camara-more-than-tim-cook-cs-disco-harvard-law/ (Accessed: 05 July 2023). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
President and Fellows of Harvard College, No. 20-1199 (June 29, 2023)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by SHG
First, the interests they view as compelling cannot be subjected to meaningful judicial review. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In an important 1961 article in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Alexander Bickel—who was a leading constitutional scholar of his generation—defended the Supreme Court’s exercise of what he called “the passive virtues. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm by Josh Blackman
First, the interests they view as compelling cannot be subjected to meaningful judicial review. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin,  Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).Joseph FishkinLoughlin’s Against Constitutionalism is a thoughtful, provocative book. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:08 am by SHG
If Harvard wants to admit people who are under six feet tall, it violates no law no matter what Randy Newman has to say about it. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 8:52 pm by Josh Blackman
If the law is on your side, argue the law. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:23 pm
”  It filed separate lawsuits against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, claiming their admissions processes, incorporating the basic principles of affirmative action,  violated students’ rights to Equal Protection Under the Law, guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin,  Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).Martin Loughlin’s new book Against Constitutionalism is extraordinarily rich and provocative. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But, as Professor Rick Hasen, a nationally prominent election law scholar, observed in a piece devoted to the "time bomb" planted in Moore, the Court also said that federal courts would have jurisdiction to decide whether state election disputes decided by state courts under state law may still violate the federal Constitution because the decisions might "exceed the bounds of ordinary judicial review. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Riann Winget
Nelson, a visiting researcher in Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation, profit does not necessarily have to be sacrificed to establish an ESG fund that meets sustainability goals. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by JB
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin,  Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).For more than two and a half decades, the Yale Law School has held a Global Constitutionalism Seminar that beings together jurists from constitutional courts around the world to talk about issues of common interest and concern. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
The main case permitting racial profiling in law enforcement, Whren v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
In particular, he noted, federal criminal laws in the late 18th century “often gave sentencing judges the authority to impose any sentence that fell within a prescribed range, and in exercising that authority, judges necessarily took into account facts that the jury had not found at trial. [read post]