Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 461 - 480 of 3,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The case innovatively applied one of America’s most robust anti-terrorism laws, the USA PATRIOT Act, to forfeit ISIS loot that U.S. soldiers identified during a 2015 raid in Syria. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The case innovatively applied one of America’s most robust anti-terrorism laws, the USA PATRIOT Act, to forfeit ISIS loot that U.S. soldiers identified during a 2015 raid in Syria.If convicted, AlCharihi could face fines, imprisonment up to two years, or both. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 The case innovatively applied one of America’s most robust anti-terrorism laws, the USA PATRIOT Act, to forfeit ISIS loot that U.S. soldiers identified during a 2015 raid in Syria. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
In his letter to Wrenn, Schepers summarized his views at the time: “As you can see, my researches cast considerable doubt on the proposition that [A]merican fibrous minerals are carcinogenic. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Household Contact/Bystander ClaimsClaims may be brought by family members (household contacts) if the substance or virus was brought home, ie. self/clothing/uniforms, by the employee and his or her family members become ill. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Once his initial complaint was rejected, he moved the country’s High Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
In an essay for The Regulatory Review’s annual Supreme Court series, Charlton Copeland argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s battle against the Chevron doctrine played a role in his decision in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
” The University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Regulatory Review launches a series of essays on the court’s 2019-20 term, including a piece by Jon Devine and David Henkin on County of Maui v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
(The court also ruled in a related but distinct case concerning Trump’s efforts to block subpoenas for his financial records from New York state law enforcement; a summary of that decision, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
Mazars USA, LLP, involved subpoenas from the House of Representatives. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Mazars USA — which involved congressional subpoenas — is a “mixed decision. [read post]