Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Woodard, which involves a strip-search of a preschool child by a state caseworker. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am by Rick Pildes
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
(The second Article V option, which allows the states to propose and ratify amendments, is a bigger long shot, as it has never been successfully called.) [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:34 am by Michael Barber
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am by Cannabis Law Group
This is true despite the fact that data overwhelmingly shows there is very little variation in the percentage of whites v. blacks who use the drug. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]