Search for: "IN RE: B.R."
Results 461 - 480
of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2014, 8:39 am
A recent case In re Culpepper, 481 B.R. 650 (D. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:02 pm
The case is In re Schivo, 462 B.R. 765 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:01 pm
In the case of In re Hionas, ___ B.R. ___, 2006 WL 3913760 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.) [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:18 pm
In re: Brown, 165 B.R. 512, 514 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
See, In re Fields, 337 B.R. 173 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Hill (In re Foster), 188 F.3d 1259, 1268-69 (10th Cir.1999); In re Courtney, 372 B.R. 519, 521 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2007); In re Bame, 251 B.R. 367, 377 (Bankr.D.Minn. 2000); In re Bazemore, 216 B.R. 1020, 1024 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1998). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Marketing Group, Inc., 337 B.R. 230 (D. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:10 pm
PA 1986) and In re Cott, 47 B.R. 487 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:02 am
., __ B.R. ___, 2010 WL 554900 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:33 pm
The case is a Bankruptcy Court decision, so its precedential authority is limited.In Re Rensin, 600 B.R. 870 (S.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm
She cites In re: B.R., a case from a couple years ago, where the court found exactly that.Justice Robinson also points out that the trial court’s findings seemed to focus a whole lot on specific mistreatment of KP, and issues specific to KP as a human that weren’t present with respect to the other children. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:39 am
In re Wilbur, 344 B.R. 650 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
United States (In re Hall), 393 B.R. 857 (D. [read post]
Are Employees Stuck with Hospital Bills When the Employer Fails to Pay the Health Insurance Premium?
12 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm
See In re Louis Jones Enters., Inc., 442 B.R. 126 (Bankr. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:39 am
In re Wilbur, 344 B.R. 650 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
Wolff (In re Wolff), 22 B.R. 510, 512 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:30 am
See, e.g., in re Coors of N. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel adopted the reasoning of the 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in the case of In re Nelson, 274 B.R. 789 (2002), recognizing that the protections of ERISA extends not only to the employee, but also to the spouse, former spouse, or dependent children, who may also be beneficiaries under the retirement plan. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
” In re Giordano, 169 B.R. 12, 13 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:33 pm
The key case is In re Miller, 188 B.R. 302(Bankr. [read post]