Search for: "IN RE: B.R." Results 461 - 480 of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2013, 2:01 pm by Jordan Bublick
In the case of In re Hionas, ___ B.R. ___, 2006 WL 3913760 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.) [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
See, In re Fields, 337 B.R. 173 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Hill (In re Foster), 188 F.3d 1259, 1268-69 (10th Cir.1999); In re Courtney, 372 B.R. 519, 521 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2007); In re Bame, 251 B.R. 367, 377 (Bankr.D.Minn. 2000); In re Bazemore, 216 B.R. 1020, 1024 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1998). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:33 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The case is a Bankruptcy Court decision, so its precedential authority is limited.In Re Rensin, 600 B.R. 870 (S.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm by Andrew Delaney
She cites In re: B.R., a case from a couple years ago, where the court found exactly that.Justice Robinson also points out that the trial court’s findings seemed to focus a whole lot on specific mistreatment of KP, and issues specific to KP as a human that weren’t present with respect to the other children. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:14 am by admin
  The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel adopted the reasoning of the 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in the case of In re Nelson, 274 B.R. 789 (2002), recognizing that the protections of ERISA extends not only to the employee, but also to the spouse, former spouse, or dependent children, who may also be beneficiaries under the retirement plan. [read post]