Search for: "In Re: B "
Results 461 - 480
of 30,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2009, 9:20 pm
In the Fifth Circuit, Section 406(b) is construed to limit the combined amount of attorney fees awarded by the agency under Section 406(a) and by the court under Section 406(b) to a total of 25% of the past due benefits. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
You can download or view the case here: In re Thomas © 2010, Melinda Deel. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:42 pm
"Plan B" centers on lobbying hard for the passage of two bills: AgJobs and the Dream Act. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
B is for Backup Withholding. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
Elizabeth B. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
The 21st Annual Howard B. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:24 pm
" B&B is not considered a blighted property. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
§ 1400(b). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 9:34 am
In case you missed the webinar from last year, we’re having another Strafford IP webinar on “Navigating Trademark Oppositions and Cancellation Proceedings at the TTAB,” next Tuesday August 18, at noon CST. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am
” On October 8, an Infosys employee emailed other Infosys executives that the two trainers needed to return to India and then re-enter the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:15 pm
“When we’re in Jeff City the legislators that we know, you figure out who you can trust, and the first bill put in front of me (in 2011) was Prop B. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:56 pm
The Thompsons’ divorce decree approved a separation agreement providing “[a]s soon as she is able, Wife shall assume or re-finance all loans on [the Home] in her own name. . . . [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:46 pm
Not cited is In re Klopfenstein, 380 F.3d 1345 (Fed. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
In the Cellect decision issued yesterday, the Federal Circuit stretches the word “disclaimer” in Section154(b)(2)(B) beyond credibility as justification for the ODP doctrine itself and assumes that is what Congress was talking about without actually saying it (stating with agreement that “The Board also reasoned that terminal disclaimers arise almost exclusively in situations to overcome ODP rejections, and so Congress, by addressing terminal disclaimers in… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
In the Cellect decision issued yesterday, the Federal Circuit stretches the word “disclaimer” in Section154(b)(2)(B) beyond credibility as justification for the ODP doctrine itself and assumes that is what Congress was talking about without actually saying it (stating with agreement that “The Board also reasoned that terminal disclaimers arise almost exclusively in situations to overcome ODP rejections, and so Congress, by addressing terminal disclaimers in… [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 12:26 pm
[B]eginning in 2005, the family home became in Laurie’s words, a “hovel” and “squalid. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:29 pm
In re Gulack, 703 F.2d 1381, 1385(Fed. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:30 pm
§ 19-6-5(b) indicates that a prior award of alimony can be modified if you decide to get re-married, and the modification will result in terminating your former spouse's alimony obligation. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
§ 606(b) (2011). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
” The upshot: if you’re defending a case like this, you’re going to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the question, and the judge would be well-advised to rule on it before trial. [read post]
