Search for: "In Re Petition of Doe"
Results 461 - 480
of 7,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
But even if the court does like the idea, he could run into a money issue. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:08 pm
In re Alvarez, 2012 WL 1425097 (Bankr. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Procedural History On October 31, 2018, Wilson filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Acknowledging the routine nature of judicial attention to patent litigation, though, “does not establish that patent validity is a matter that, from its nature, must be decided by a court. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
As stated above, issue preclusion barred re-litigation of the first DuPont factor: the similarity of the marks. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 6:02 am
It might not be possible to petition the court to dismiss your case. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 6:02 am
It might not be possible to petition the court to dismiss your case. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:07 pm
In re Nine West Group, Inc., FTC Dkt. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Today, we’re speaking about this important tool that should be found in any trademark practitioner’s tool box, and in case you’re not able to attend, here is a table I put together that helps me consider which tool works in which context: What do you think? [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 10:38 am
How long does it take the case to progress to this point in the habeas process? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
In In re Manhattan College, (NLRB, Jan. 10, 2010), a National Labor Relations Board regional director held that the judicially and administratively developed exemption from NLRB coverage for colleges whose purpose is the propagation of a religious faith does not apply to New York's Manhattan College. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:00 am
In re Johnny K.F. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:22 pm
Res. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
In re Dylan H. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
In re Dylan H. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:42 am
So they're banging their heads at the next wall. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
The rule governing this procedure, which essentially involves a motion for an order requiring the opponent to re-plead, is rule 91 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP 91). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:08 am
That appeal does give you a brand new trial. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:24 pm
Although the court has no reason to doubt that the proponent found herself in trying circumstances as a result of her brother's illness, this circumstance does not give the proponent a license to ignore the court's directions with impunity and does not warrant the expenditure of judicial resources to re-examine the applications that were originally ignored by the proponent. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 10:01 pm
When Does Breach of Fiduciary Duty Apply? [read post]
