Search for: "In re: Michael Smith" Results 461 - 480 of 1,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
But we're in this universe in which you read these words. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 7:36 am by Terry Hart
Carnegie-Mellon economics professor Michael Smith recently spoke at the Digital Book World conference in New York on the topic of piracy’s negative effects. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
., Global Director of Client Value, Reed Smith, LLP Peter Lane Secor, Director of Strategic Pricing and Project Management, Pepper Hamilton LLP Michael Hourwitz, Chief Financial Officer, Venable, LLP Moderator: Robbie Friedman, CEO + co-founder, Viewabill After an introduction, we jumped into the session. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
Among the features in this issue are * a masterly survey of the non-patentability of essentially biological processes under the European Patent Convention by Michael A. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm by VMaryAbraham
v=AWJJnQybZlk [Hat tip to Michael Mills of Neota Logic for reminding me of Asimov's Three Laws.] [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
School of Law (for more, read the whole thing): Howard University School of Law expelled Michael Newman. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
Even so, we’re hopeful that in one of the pending lawsuits challenging the program, including EFF’s case Smith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
 As of today, 33 people have signed up to attend.There are some other exciting events coming soon, even if they're not the IPKat's. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
If so, that judgment would be the first final judgment in the matter and would thereby have a preclusive effect under principles of res judicata on the later Texas judgment in Pierce's favor. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
  WOE Cometh Because the WOE methodology is not well described, either in the published literature or in Martyn Smith’s litigation report, it is difficult to understand exactly what the First Circuit approved by reversing Smith’s exclusion. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Witness Against Gaetz Is Cooperating with House Ethics Investigation DNyuz – Robert Draper and Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 2/9/2024 A lawyer for the chief witness against U.S. [read post]