Search for: "J&J Industries, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 2,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Defendant Sanofi challenged plaintiffs’ statistical expert witness, David Madigan, a frequent testifier for the lawsuit industry. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
Solkatronic Chemical, Inc.,[16] where the trial judge excluded the testimony of a medical expert witness who opined that plaintiff had been injured by exposure to arsine gas. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Another vacuous response to a methodological challenge under Rule 702 is to label the challenge as “going to the weight, not the admissibility” of the challenged expert witness’s testimony. [read post]
Instead, it is also about a persistent view of trade unions that predates the platform economy and efforts to avoid unionisation (as the extreme facts in United Steelworkers of America v Baron Metal Industries Inc illustrate). [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am by Benjamin Mitchel and Philip R. Stein
J. 2014) (granting businesses’ motion for summary judgment based on Court’s finding that ammonia discharge inflicted physical loss of or damage to covered property, noting that “[w]hile structural alteration provides the most obvious signs of physical damage…property can sustain physical loss or damage without experiencing structural alteration. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:22 am
Triton Pacific Adviser, LLC, Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., Triton Pacific Capitol Partners, LLC, Triton Pacific Investment Group, LLC, Craig J. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Significant credit surely goes to Michael Jacobson (known affectionately as “Mike J”), eBay’s first General Counsel. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As per In re: Signet Jewelers Limited Securities Litigation:   [J]udicial approval of a class action settlement is a two-step process. [read post]
Apple Inc., et al., the same court dismissed a claim for enhanced damages on the grounds that, even if the defendant Motorola had the alleged policy of not reviewing third party patents, such a policy “does not per-se constitute ‘willful blindness. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
Back in the summer of 2019, Judge Saylor, the MDL judge presiding over the Zofran birth defect cases, ordered epidemiologist, Dr. [read post]