Search for: "Jacobs v. Major"
Results 461 - 480
of 636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2021, 4:01 pm
United StatesMeriwether v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
Gaines [Picked by Brendan V. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Brooks, Touro College, Jacob D. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Mazola oil, or Muir Glen v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am
Dawson v White & Case, 88 NY2d 666, 670 [1996]). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
The announcement came after a memorandum from Jersey City’s Chief Prosecutor Jacob V. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:18 pm
That case, Watson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm
True, as Judge Jacobs notes, "the law was passed by overwhelming bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress; it has varying impact on more than a thousand federal laws; and the definition of marriage it affirms has been long-supported and encouraged. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm
True, as Judge Jacobs notes, "the law was passed by overwhelming bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress; it has varying impact on more than a thousand federal laws; and the definition of marriage it affirms has been long-supported and encouraged. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
In fact, the entire Omega v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The Gupta case is U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Seen in that light, the major questions doctrine sounds less rooted in Justice Gorsuch’s concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
The majority further explained, We have examined the record for the proof that the courts have found necessary to impose royalty-free licensing, but do not find it. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:36 pm
That’s a major theme in Macbeth. [read post]
