Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2" Results 461 - 480 of 2,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:25 am by Charles Bieneman
Kelora, the plaintiff  and successor to PartsRiver, Inc., had asserted against the defendants independent claims 1 and 9, as well as claims 2-4 depending from claim 1, of U.S. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Lanham Act.TTABlog comment: Maybe this case should have been a WYHA? [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 10:19 pm
" In fact, anyone who watched the video had no doubt that it was 7 1/2 minutes of MLB's copyrighted work...but the Seventh Circuit opinion nevertheless encouraged readers to view it. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Cir. 1990); Saddlesprings, Inc., 104 USPQ2d at 1950.To overcome the presumption of abandonment, the party must submit evidence of either (1) use of the mark during the statutory period, or (2) activities reflecting an intent to resume (or begin) use during that period. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Therefore the association of Applicant's products with Havana "undoubtedly would be material" to the purchasing decision.The Board therefore affirmed the Section 2(e)(3) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 4:54 am
Opposer contends that the tone does not function as at trademark, and that the tone is not inherently distinctive and has not acquired distinctiveness].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:35 pm
Relevant factor to make that determination include whether the individual (1) had the authority to hire and fire workers; (2) supervised the employee's work; (3) made decisions about employee compensation; or (4) maintained employment records. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
IPBiz notes that a good discussion of "how" inequitable conduct is applied, post-Therasense, is found in the dissent by Judge Newman in AMERICAN CALCAR, INC. , ironically a case wherein inequitable conduct was found in a 2-1 vote at the CAFC. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:10 am
" The Examining Attorney determined that the applied-for mark was merely descriptive of the services, and therefore he entered a Section 2(e)(1) refusal. [read post]