Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders" Results 461 - 480 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm by Ryan Calo
The prospect of excessive surveillance through technology was recently front and center in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Leroy McCarthy was also serving a suspended sentence for abusing police officers. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
RESTITUTION--A disposition requiring a defendant to pay damages to a victim. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  It held that there had been no valid service on the defendant because the address used was not the defendant’s representative in the UK, it was merely an office in London from which the defendant did not carry out business. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am by Jeremy Saland
" The Velez case relied on by the court addresses the presumption issue in more detail: "The [car] presumption establishes a prima facie case against a defendant, who may, if he chooses, rebut it by interposing evidence to the contrary (People v Lemmons, 40 NY2d 505, 510; People v Jones, 57 AD2d 595). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-1487Issue: Whether a felony conviction, which makes it unlawful for the defendant to possess a firearm, prevents a court under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or under general equity principles from ordering that the government (1) transfer non-contraband firearms to an unrelated third party to whom the defendant has sold all his property interests; or (2) sell the firearms for the benefit of the defendant. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (Art Lien) We can see this philosophy at work in Kennedy’s 2013 concurrence in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Hewitt, doesn't this [questioning the effectiveness of the Church's enactment of the Dennis Canon] call into question the teaching of Jones v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2020, Steyn J handed down the judgement in DXB v Persons Unknown [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), a claim brought pursuant to “the Venables jurisdiction” for an extension of the anonymity of a child defendant beyond his 18th birthday. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:55 am by SHG
But the lawyer from the state Office of the Defender General decided to go it on her own. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Criminal record check in public school employment, volunteer service, see 18A:6-7.1. [read post]