Search for: "L.J.-I."
Results 461 - 480
of 1,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
L.J. 295, 303 (1983). [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:30 am
., Duke L.J. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:18 am
Aaron Caplan (author of “Free Speech and Civil Harassment Orders,” 64 Hastings L.J. 781 (2013)) and me (as author of “One-To-One Speech vs. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Litt, The Fourth Amendment in the Information Age, 126 YALE L.J. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
The only decision I could find on point concurs. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
The only decision I could find on point concurs. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm
The main part of the opinion adopts a view of the non-delegation doctrine that I explained and relied on as part of the argument in my article Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution, 50 Duke L.J. 17 (2000), so I’m glad about that–at least in principle; whether these facts justified invocation of the doctrine I leave for others to decide. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
I must once more voice my disagreement with the Court’s rigidified approach to equal protection analysis. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
L.J. 698 (2015). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
” (The transcript reads "no path to loss of status," but I heard Erin Murphy to say "lawful status," which makes more sense.) [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
I. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
My students Daniel Korda, Melanie Rollins, and Sam Sazer and I filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment, arguing in favor of the result that the court just reached. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am
Caplan, Free Speech and Civil Harassment Orders, 64 Hastings L.J. 781, 817-26 (2013). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:22 pm
L.J. 727 (2010). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:24 am
L.J. 1023 (2012). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
As a result, I think it would be a bad idea to apply deferential standards in patent law or criminal law.(...)Deference created a zone in which the agency would regulate. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:30 am
L.J. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:30 am
Kelly, The Right to Include, 63 Emory L.J. 857 (2014), available at SSRN. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:42 pm
I strongly disagree. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:23 pm
L.J. 1023 (2015):Part I of this Note tracks the development of standing under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act and analyzes the three-way circuit split on false advertising standing that existed before the Lexmark decision. [read post]
