Search for: "LYNCH V DEFENSE" Results 461 - 480 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In September 2008, the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America and an $85 billion (and now $170 billion) government investment in American International Group. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
By adopting a more nuanced analysis, the Second Edition deprived defense counsel of a readily citable source for the proposition that low relative risks do not support inferences of specific causation. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that Michael Wearry’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Navy and Department of Defense personnel had been called and arrived at his residence, but did not find the gun they were told he had. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
Without such a defensive power, every positive power that can be given on paper will be unavailing. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
After intercepting communications suggesting that ISIS may have downed the Russian jetliner that crashed in the Sinai Peninsula, British investigators now strongly believe that a bomb in the plane’s hold was responsible for the crash, the Wall Street Journal reports. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
   In a unanimous three-judge panel ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[5] Judge Weinstein was no push-over for strident defense counsel or expert witnesses, but the legal consequences were nonetheless obvious to him, when he looked carefully at the animal studies plaintiffs’ expert witnesses were claiming to support their opinions. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]