Search for: "Landes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 461 - 480 of 1,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
But he proceeds from a particular vantage, that of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am by Sarah Turberville
There are just sixteen counties (out of over three thousand in the United States) where five or more death sentences have been imposed between 2010-2015. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The idea was that the federal government has no business impressing a land use cookie cutter across the country.Starting with Village of Euclid v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
It was in the highest appellate court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, that the final word was handed down. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Child Custody – Tribal Court Jurisdiction)United States of America vs. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Child Custody - Tribal Court Jurisdiction)United States of America vs. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm by Mark Murakami
We sympathize with Appellants’ individual plights, apparently more freighted with duty and sacrifice than benefits and privilege, but the Citizenship Clause is textually ambiguous as to whether “in the United States” encompasses America’s unincorporated territories and we hold it “impractical and anomalous,” see Reid v. [read post]