Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Parra, ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) Objections Eduardo Silva Romero Consolidation and Parallel Proceedings Veijo Heiskanen, And Others: Mass Claims in ICSID Arbitration Brigitte Stern, Interim/Provisional Measures Marc Lalonde, Quo Vadis Disqualification? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
The 14th Amendment lays out new rules for what the states cannot do and a new rule about who is disqualified from holding another office. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:41 am
Accordingly, in view of the great deference given to the testator’s selected fiduciary, this case serves to reiterate the longstanding rule that actual misconduct is the key to the disqualification of a fiduciary; potential misconduct is not enough. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:16 am
Witt, a psychologist, who examined him in connection with the disciplinary matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
In the place of disqualification came impeachment.Last week in my Evidence class, we talked about impeaching criminal defendants’ testimony with prior convictions, as allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 609. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
In addition to disqualification based on the Bankruptcy Code, violating state ethics rules can also lead to disqualification. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
Rulings may be less likely to go your way. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:39 am
In particular, please notify this Office if you currently represent clients or adjudicate matters in which this Office is involved and/or you have a family member who is representing clients or adjudicating matters in which this Office is involved so that we can evaluate any potential conflict of interest or disqualification issue that may need to be addressed under those circumstances. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:16 am
Disqualification after impeachment poses a similar risk, albeit less acutely because the voting rules make a party-line or near party-line vote almost impossible. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 8:59 am
Even in those rare times that I lose a motion -- very rare :-) -- I've almost never thought the judge was biased or, for that matter, even wrong. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
In this opinion the court denied the motion because under Massachusetts' unique screening rule neither lawyer had 'substantial involvement' in the earlier matter nor had 'substantial information," and they were screened from this matter.'" One-Click Disqualification? [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:33 am
Click here to read more about this Civil Service Disqualification case. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Rule 3.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 N.Y.C.R.R. 1200.0) does provides that, unless certain exceptions apply, “[a] lawyer shall not act as advocate before a tribunal in a matter in which the lawyer is likely to be a witness on a significant issue of fact. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Indeed, given the placement of the comma after the phrase "Constitution of the United States," one might even contend that Judge Luttig's reading is preferable--purely as a matter of punctuation--than the alternative reading. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
Also, the use of a disqualification rule based on the appearance of impropriety has important practical advantages. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:19 am
Frye's motion for disqualification. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
“Medina Spirit’s disqualification,” as a matter of law, “had no impact on the plaintiffs’ wagers. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:31 pm
Therefore, if an official resigns his or her public office at any point before conviction after trial in the Court for the Trial of Impeachments, the Court would lose its jurisdiction to rule in the matter, as it may only render a judgment that removes an official from office. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 6:45 pm
His defense attorney never challenged this or took any efforts to make sure that the small prosecutor's office had an effective Chinese Wall in place In a unanimous opinion, the court of Appeals reversed his conviction and sent the matter back to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing where the prosecution was required to prove that there was an adequate Chinese wall in place. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
The Federal Circuit concluded that placing the stock in a blind trust is not divestment and Judge Morgan was disqualified under the statute, and the ruling was vacated. [read post]
