Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
In a highly-cited 2001 article, Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, Mark Lemley argued that it doesn’t make sense to invest more resources in examination: since only a minority of patents are licensed or litigated, thorough scrutiny should be saved for only those patents that turn out to be valuable. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 2:05 am
which contained some questionable statements by Professor Mark Lemley, advisor to Barack Obama on patents.Both the Clinton and Lemley stories show a carelessness in not checking out the underlying facts. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 1:08 pm
" Of popular myth, see 8 JMRIPL 80 (2008).Yes, Mark Lemley is mentioned. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 7:16 am
"DowJones quoted Lemley in the text:Stanford University law professor Mark Lemley said that if the patent office loses, any reforms in the patent system will have to come from Congress, which has been unable to move forward on patent-reform legislation in recent years. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
John Allison has done some great empirical work on patent litigation, including a recent project with Mark Lemley and David Schwartz on all substantive decisions rendered by any court in every patent case filed in 2008 and 2009 (with articles in Texas and Chicago), and a project on repeat patent litigants with Mark Lemley and Joshua Walker that I blogged about back in 2011. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
In doing so, Ghosh joins many other scholars in addressing the fascinating topic of IP and federalism, including Mark Lemley, Paul Goldstein, Paul Heald, John Shepard Wiley, Douglas Lichtman, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeanne Fromer, Paul Gugliuzza, and myself. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:18 am
From a patent perspective, him having Mark Lemley as advisor speaks volumes. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:58 am
Stanford University professor Mark Lemley and AT&T Vice President Jeff Brueggeman discussed concerns about Internet service providers (ISPs) blocking content for subscribers. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Mark Lemley: to do this we need a very clear definition that is significantly narrower than existing definitions. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:02 am
Durie & Mark A. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 7:12 am
The articles all look very interesting; mine in particular is on AI and the First Amendment—readers of the blog might find it familiar, since it's based on past articles (including one cowritten with Mark Lemley and Peter Henderson), but it might still be a helpful shortish digest of those longer articles.The post Lawfare AI Liability Symposium appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
By Eric Goldman Last month, I spoke with Mark Lemley and Peter Menell at a Silicon Valley IP Law Association dinner event designed to be a "year-in-review" of IP. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:35 pm
Lemley Ask, Don't Tell: Ethical Issues Surrounding Undocumented Workers' Status in Employment Litigation Christine N. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
The court agreed with the first part, but, as the responsible entity for legal determinations, not on the latter.Mark Lemley & Mark McKenna will be glad to hear how the court approached the issue:Before the Court can assess the merits of Cedar Valley’s infringement claims and Professional Exteriors’ defenses, the Court must first determine the scope of the registered marks. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:23 am
Mark Lemley stated that the norms of the science world differ from the norms of the patent world. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Dogan & Lemley; David Simon; Tushnet & Keller have cataloged the scene. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
Janis & Mark Lemley. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
Misleading marks: inherently deceptive marks—19th c. courts were very quick to refuse relief where there was any sort of deception inherent in the mark—moralistic. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
Anyone who thinks the Lemley text isn't about the invention of the integrated circuit is simply disconnected from reality.See alsoNoonan on Wegner on "Besson" PatentHawk did not mention Quillen's previous assertion of a 97% patent grant rate at the USPTO, a fanciful allegation that even Mark Lemley discarded. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford), Mark McKenna (Notre Dame), and Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard) have joined together in supporting the rehearing. [read post]
