Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 461 - 480 of 1,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The Value of Bidding on Keywords Containing 1-8oo Contacts’ Marks The dissent repeats several times that 1-800 Contacts’ settlement agreements restricted only one form of advertising, leaving open many other advertising channels. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:24 am by Joseph Arshawsky
The Eighth Circuit, however, affirmed the district court’s judgment of trademark infringement and dilution pertaining to SMRI’s registered “Sturgis Bike Week” mark and its registered “Monahan” design mark for the rally because the marks were entitled to a presumption of validity when the infringing use occurred (Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bucklew v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
(USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 85 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness whose event study and causal conclusion failed to consider relevant [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Frank v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Preap, which involves the immigration law’s mandatory detention provision, and Gundy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:58 am by George Basharis
Further, the marks were visually dissimilar, and The Row Kitchen and Pub offered very little evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the Whiskey Row mark created the likelihood of confusion (The Row, Inc. v. [read post]