Search for: "Martin v. People" Results 461 - 480 of 1,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am by Jeff Gamso
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
  Texas Rangers Leonys Martin Tapanes was apparently kidnapped and extorted, leading to federal charges. [read post]
Martin Luther King,” such as “peaceful sit-ins at lunch counters—an act of simple trespass. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:56 am by Theodore Harvatin
This can and has led to what many believe to be harsh results, as best exemplified by the case of People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
On 9 July 2021 Kenneth Martin J handed down judgment in the case of Nguyen v Hinsley [2021] WASC 220, striking out multiple parts of the defence and counterclaim, with leave to replead. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in (among others) Young v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Ruled Not in Custody During Initial Pre-'Miranda' Statements; Suppression Denied People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:18 am
Estate of Bass ROCKLAND COUNTYCriminal PracticeEvidence Before Grand Jury Legally Sufficient; Indictment Defective as Did Not Conform to §200.50 People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm by Florian Mueller
D, Iain Sharp, Michael Allan Martin Davies, Denis Mazeaud, Albert A. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Martin J. concurring): “We would allow the appeal and order a new trial. [read post]