Search for: "Matter of B.C."
Results 461 - 480
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
We do not say that the employee must have a responsibility and discretion about all of these matters. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:43 pm
 (1979), 12 B.C.L.R. 335 (S.C.), aff’d 14 B.C.L.R. 377 (C.A.). [40] This brings me back to the B.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
We do not say that the employee must have a responsibility and discretion about all of these matters. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
It remains to be seen whether the BC Court of Appeal’s decision in Envirocon will be the end of the matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:36 am
Court of Appeal in Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The Mighty Hughes reveals the background to Ted Hughes’ unprecedented resignation from the Saskatchewan Court of Queens Bench over a matter of principle at the age of 53, and the Hughes family decision to move to Victoria B.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:27 pm
The URL for the B.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
A glaring omission in this case history cited by the Court of Appeals is the case of B.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
While the wife and husband in this dispute did not contest that the remaining embryo be treated as property, the issue was there was only one embryo and it could not be divided as the straws were in the B.C. case. [read post]
1 May 2016, 8:34 am
What’s scarier is that EMPowerplus may have been responsible for the death of another child in B.C. in 2012. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:04 pm
A glaring omission in this case history cited by the Court of Appeals is the case of B.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
It is enough for him to establish, as I find that he has, a reduction in its value: seeCummings v. 565204 B.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
While the wife and husband in this dispute did not contest that the remaining embryo be treated as property, the issue was there was only one embryo and it could not be divided as the straws were in the B.C. case. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 10:26 am
Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia Law Clinic Professor, Vancouver, B.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:12 pm
It has not, however, been definitively dealt with in the B.C. courts. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:32 pm
No. 818, the issue before the court was whether a B.C. dental hygienist was an independent contractor or an employee for tax purposes. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:55 pm
In contracts, as in business, it is the small details that can matter most. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm
Madam Justice Griffin granted the motion and in doing so made the following comments about the scope of permissible discovery questions under the new rules: [6] Rule 7-2(18)(a) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
A quick review of the legal databases shows that in 2010 and 2011 this principle has been explained, referred to and applied by courts in B.C., Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario and Quebec. [read post]
