Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
§ 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Lanham Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm
The question before the justice is whether an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement that allows officers to detain bystanders while executing a search warrant (Michigan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Questions? [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Question 3 (40 percent)You’re still in the version of reality described by Question 2. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court expires (or, alternatively, cert. is denied). [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:16 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:56 pm
The question matters because class actions are often the only thing stopping companies like cell phone or cable providers from getting away with practices that cheat large numbers of consumers out of small amounts of money. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:20 am
This factor greatly enhances the issue's certworthinesss because cert. petitions filed in the Supreme Court by public employers are more likely to raise important constitutional questions, the resolution of which will likely impact a greater number of people than a petition filed by an individual. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Such decisions are supposed to be applied retroactively no matter when a conviction was “final. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Cert. petition Judulang’s petition for certiorari highlighted the split among the circuits (explained below) as well as the important constitutional questions and the importance of the issue to numerous lawful permanent residents. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
No matter how you (or I) write it, there is an ideological or “political” tinge to the retroactivity debate. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:28 am
Back in September I noted that the Supreme Court granted cert. in a pair of state-secrets privilege (“SSP”) cases, General Dynamics v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
First, sometimes timing matters just as much as substance. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:18 am
As usual, Justice Thomas didn’t ask a single question; Justice Alito didn’t either. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” In a second post at Cato at Liberty, Shapiro and Stephens argue for a cert grant in Contest Promotions v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
” The phone number for CERT is now 6101824891, but the mailing address is still Ralphael Metzger’s law office. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
I'm waiting to get access to the opinion and will write in more detail very soon, but here is my analysis of the case, written back when cert was granted:This case raises the question of who may sue to enforce the Establishment Clause. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
Does it matter whether the officers are searching for weapons rather than drugs? [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:21 am
As a matter of law, the Court concludes that the Penalties provision reaches Airbnb in its capacity as a booking agent and payment processor. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:27 am
Whether that will happen again is a question I leave to those with more expertise in the substantive law implicated by Wolf v. [read post]
