Search for: "Matter of Johnson v Johnson"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Leocal v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 8:59 am
Hodges v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Here's another such case (which I think expresses what today would be the minority view), from 1913 Arkansas, Moore v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
Gil v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:37 am
The Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are all acceptable. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
But, the matter at hand does not constitute an emergency. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am
” Pulley v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
See e.g., Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Note: Defendants have sought a stay pending resolution of Susan Johnson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
The case is Esparaza v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
Johnson Chem. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:50 am
” The case is entitled Rood v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:54 am
Johnson, 551 F.3d 1019 (D.C. [read post]