Search for: "Matter of Jones"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 8:52 am
The Fifth Circuit in 2009 ruled that Jones can pursue her case in court, concluding that her rape allegations "do not touch matters related to her employment. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
But how should we view the Ryan and Carona matters? [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:05 am
No matter what happened, if you have been injured working on a jack-up rig, you should talk to a lawyer about your legal rights. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 12:23 pm
” After that, the panel discussed other matters for a while — but Vladeck steered the conversation back to judge-shopping. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
If you don’t have your freedom, nothing matters. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Then came Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
A good starting point is discussing the matter with your manager. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am
In conjunction with their efforts, Defendants noted that the Plaintiff in the instant matter had already filed a state court suit in which the decedent had been adjudged to have been a Jones Act seaman, and therefore there could be little question that Scarborough would apply to the claims at issue before the Eastern District. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am
In conjunction with their efforts, Defendants noted that the Plaintiff in the instant matter had already filed a state court suit in which the decedent had been adjudged to have been a Jones Act seaman, and therefore there could be little question that Scarborough would apply to the claims at issue before the Eastern District. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
** Jones v Muniz, posted on the Internet at https://casetext.com/case/jones-v-munizThe Second Circuit Court's decision is posted on the Internet at:https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200626119 [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
** Jones v Muniz, posted on the Internet at https://casetext.com/case/jones-v-munizThe Second Circuit Court's decision is posted on the Internet at:https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200626119 [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Probably they don't have to, since (i) breach of contract in an IP case isn't really an IP infringement but a contract matter and (ii) it's not clear if confidential information is IP for the purposes of the Directive.Lance-corporal Jones hereIncorporeal Jones hereJones the Cat hereWrotham Park here [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:43 am
Jones referred him to his internist. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
While New York does allow for some exceptions to the time limitations rule, they are not applicable in this type of matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:21 am
The Florida securities lawyers at McCabe Rabin, P.A. represent investors nationwide in FINRA arbitration matters. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:54 pm
Does it matter that Jones is also seeking punitive damages? [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:04 am
District Judge James Moody Jr. granted a preliminary injunction on June 17, enjoining the state from enforcing the law during the pendency of the matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:27 am
Judge Jones’ recent published decision in Clementi v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:29 am
Judge Jones does not get this. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:59 am
He’s also written for the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and Mother Jones. [read post]
