Search for: "Matter of Murphy v Murphy"
Results 461 - 480
of 935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Murphy specifically preserved and raised the issue on appeal, an exception to the prospective-only rule should be made. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Supreme Court transferred the matter to the Appellate Division.Citing Chenango Forks Central School District v PERB, 21 NY3d 255, the Appellate Division said that its review of a PERB determination is limited to whether it is supported by substantial evidence, that is, whether there is a basis in the record allowing for the conclusion that "PERB's decision was legally permissible, rational and thus not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:16 am
Carr v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Laurin said Erin Murphy's book, Inside the Cell: The Dark Side of Forensic DNA is "burning a hole in my desk" for wont of reading. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
’” Id. at 9–10, citing Gilmer v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Legal Blogging and the Rhetorical Genre of Public Legal Writing Jennifer Murphy Romig, Instructor of Legal Writing, Research and Advocacy, Emory University School of LawLegal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, Vol. 12, 2015 Excerpt: Introduction, Section II, and Appendices Introduction Now is the time to bring scholarly attention to a new genre of legal writing: the blog posts, tweets, updates, and other writing on social media that many lawyers generate and many others would consider… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Stewart v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
‘During arguments Jan. 15 in Lambrix v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
Murphy Oil USA, Incorporated v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm
It did not matter that the children’s parents were celebrities: the children should be treated in the same way as those of a child whose parents were not in the public eye. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
`[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
This changed in 1977 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bates v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
The Court flirted with (and Justice Murphy would have accepted) the Spiderman Theory of state action. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
A few years ago I was doing some work for a professional association on guidelines for dealing with litigants without counsel and I was struck by the extent to which some legal professionals regard litigants without counsel as interlopers who gum up the finely tuned, well-oiled machine that is their justice system. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
But that procedural matter struck me as a bit too inside-baseball to blog about, especially since I knew that this brief was forthcoming. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
