Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G." Results 461 - 480 of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm by Matthew Kolken
 See Matter of Robert BAUTISTA, 25 I&N Dec. 616 (BIA 2011).The BIA used the categorical approach set forth in Taylor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
” A1 and A2 were found to infringe, but the B to G devices were not. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twelfth day of December in the year two thousand fifteen.BY THE GOVERNORSecretary to the Governors/ [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:56 am by PaulKostro
N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(b) sets forth a variety of factors for the court’s consideration in determining an alimony award. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the… [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:27 pm by Richard Burt
The Delaware court had previously decided a similar matter in Ascension Insurance Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
He was not satisfied that access authorisation data in UMTS is transmitted as a bit pattern.Birss J also found that HTC device classes B to G do not infringe. [read post]