Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."
Results 461 - 480
of 869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 10:39 am
More than any other development in 2012, the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:41 am
Interestingly, while the court found that both parties’ experts met the Daubert standard, it found no need to decide whether Daubert applied at all in this context, and did not reference the discussion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:32 am
In context, in some Wal-Mart stores, the bins are immediately adjacent to each other, magnifying the similarity. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:37 am
May 01, 2012 Wal-Mart Stores Inc., headquartered in Bentonville, Ark., has agreed to pay $4,828,442 in back wages and damages to more than 4,500 employees nationwide following an investigation by the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:40 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
P. 23 analysis of the sort contemplated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the court granted a motion to dismiss where the defense of consent appeared on the face of the complaint. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 11:00 am
Session 3 examined the conceptual issues and practical challenges that litigants and courts face in cases seeking certification under the different subparts of Rule 23(b), a question that took on increased importance following the Supreme Court’s Decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 159 F. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 382, which held that the last valid offer shifts costs. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 537 F. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 2:07 pm
Interestingly, although the court did not cite the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 1:51 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., makes clear that medical marijuana users are not a protected class in the context of private sector employment. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
In McReynolds, which was decided after the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
Citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
