Search for: "NAACP v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
Bronx NAACP Child Dev. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
A very similar case is pending before a three-judge-panel in Georgia – Georgia State Conf. of the NAACP v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 2:28 pm
In Hunt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Second, in NAACP v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:58 am
NAACP, No. 18–588) all ruled for the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:32 am
As for retaliation against donors, “although the Attorney General correctly points out that such abuses are not as violent or pervasive as those encountered in NAACP v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 2:42 pm
The US Supreme Court is currently deciding several cases that involve free speech, such as NRA v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:24 am
Indiana's cert petition in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 628 (1984).This strikes me as quite wrong. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Chief Justice William Howard Taft in Meyers v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
State), or on all sleeping in public parks (Clark v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:41 pm
And the recent Court of Appeals decision in Hurrell-Harring v the State of New York, which reinstated the NYCLU lawsuit, looms above those negotiations. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Supp. 3d 238, 241 (D.D.C. 2017) (staying effective date of vacatur order for about one year to avoid the potential for disruption); NAACP v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
TV Censorship – FCC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:45 am
There was never any serious question that the prosecution would be prohibited under RAV v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:51 pm
(Ilya Somin) Some critics of Cato’s stance in the Cato v. [read post]
