Search for: "New York v. Connecticut"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:04 am
(Byrne v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
(Byrne v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 15732 (ND NY, Jan. 31, 2018), a New York federal district court issued a preliminary injunction allowing a Muslim inmate to engage in individual demonstrable prayer during outdoor recreation, but denied a preliminary injunction as to group prayer.In Pouncil v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
New York has a statute barring retaliation for off-duty recreational activities. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
(See, e.g., Germain, 756 F.3d at pp. 941-954 [construing the laws of Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia]; Phelps v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
LEXIS 212172 (SD NY, Dec. 27, 2017), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that during Ramadan, his medications were delivered during fasting hours.In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 pm
During the 2017 legislative session, bills dealing with biometric notice and consent regimes similar to BIPA were introduced in several states, including Alaska (H.B. 72), Arizona, Connecticut (H.B. 5522), Massachusetts (H.B. 1985 ), Montana (H.B. 518), Missouri, New Hampshire (H.B. 523) and New York – but all failed to pass. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 pm
During the 2017 legislative session, bills dealing with biometric notice and consent regimes similar to BIPA were introduced in several states, including Alaska (H.B. 72), Arizona, Connecticut (H.B. 5522), Massachusetts (H.B. 1985 ), Montana (H.B. 518), Missouri, New Hampshire (H.B. 523) and New York – but all failed to pass. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Topping the list are New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, California, Massachusetts, Illinois, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:15 am
Here is the statement from the New York Times. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
§§ 1692e, 1692f, and had charged a usurious rate of interest in violation of New York law, N.Y. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
§§ 1692e, 1692f, and had charged a usurious rate of interest in violation of New York law, N.Y. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
