Search for: "Old Chief v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 1,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
But we agree with the California court here that hospitals are required to obey state laws giving everyone a right to health care and that decisions about who can receive treatment cannot be made through a religious lens.Controversy 3: The Ministerial Exception: Where Non-believers Are Magically Transformed into “Ministers”Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch joined Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh in expanding the ministerial exception in… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm by Emily Hammond
There, the Supreme Court upheld a California moratorium on new nuclear power plants within the state until the United States developed a means of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As I noted last week and major news outlets have also reported, the United States Supreme Court is poised next week to consider taking up the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case involving the so-called Independent-State- Legislature (ISL) theory. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Filed: December 10, 1999. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Alex Manevich
The plaintiff’s chief submission is based on Section 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm by David Kopel
That is, the law had long been unenforced and ignored–similar to the old laws in several states against certain sex acts that were discussed by the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am by Josh Blackman
United States, both Chief Justice Taft and Justice Brandeis accepted this understanding of Federalist No. 77. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:47 pm by legalinformatics
Here is a summary of the article: In the 1950s and 1960s, the southern [United] states struggled to respond to the civil rights decisions being issued by the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:51 am by Charles Kotuby
U.S. courts can “command[] [a party properly before it] to take action … outside the United States” under the pain of sanctions for non-compliance, the Chief Justice said. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am by SHG
It was terribly confusing, and the chads were too hard for olds to work. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 Thursday: New York State Pistol & Rifle Ass'n v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In this post, we analayse a fairly old decision of a single Judge of the Supreme Court of India in Denel Proprietary v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
  On April 26th, the Commanding General of the Army of the United States, Winfield Scott, the old veteran of the Mexican War, warned that an attack was coming. [read post]