Search for: "PER-CO LTD" Results 461 - 480 of 1,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
“[T]he duty to account is a typical feature of the agent’s position” (Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, 20th ed., at paragraph 1-032, citing Michelin Tyre Co Ltd v Macfarlane (Glasgow) Ltd [1917] 2 SLT 205); iv) In other respects, too, the usual incidents of agency were missing from the 2000 Agreement. [read post]
For further analysis of the effect of The New Flamenco on commercial contracts more generally, we would recommend that you refer to our Client Alert on this case which you can access here: http://www.reedsmith.com/The-challenge-of-mitigating-your-losses-where-there-is-no-available-market–The-New-Flamenco-02-25-2016/ [1] Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama v Globalia Travel SAU [2015] EWCA Civ 1299 (judgment handed down on 21 December 2015) [2] See also our ENR Client Alert which considers the… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
Were it not for the percentage increases of 10% per annum specified in the 25 service charge clauses which are being considered on this appeal, coupled with the subsequent history of inflation in the United Kingdom, that would be the end of it. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation… [read post]